Why Shift to Eco-Taxes?

See our one page Tax Swap PDF or Tax Swap Spreadsheet with current ABS data.                                                                     

Our present economy places too low a price on many goods and services because the future consequences of consumption of these goods and services is not reflected in their price.

Free-Market economic systems only price things appropriately if all of the costs associated with a good or service are encapsulated within its price. The Free Market breaks down where:

One solution for these problems is for the owner of the damaged resources (the people) to levy a compulsory charge (tax) on these activities so that the market price properly reflects the actual cost of the activity. Another is to totally prohibit the activity altogether. This may be appropriate in some circumstances but in most would cause unacceptable economic dislocation.

Making it Revenue Neutral

As shown on the Tax Reform Home page the shift to Eco-Taxation should be fully revenue-neutral - so there is no net impact on the economy, employment or Australia's competitive position. Infact our competitiveness is improved due to the removal of so many bad taxes like Payroll Tax.

Making it Progressive

Eco-Tax reform can be progressive if the package contains:

Water Taxes

Australia faces huge problems in securing adequate water which will only get worse as Climate Change accelerates. However, current water pricing is far too low to make spending on conservation sensible for most consumers.

Logging Tax

Currently State governments (particularly Victoria & Tasmania) do not charge enough for logging licences. This has led to large scale extraction of timber for low-value uses such as wood-chips. A Federally applied tax on logging can resolve this, reducing logging and increasing water flows to rivers.

Pollution Tax

This should be applied to pollution from:

Non-Recyclable Goods Tax

This should apply to goods that are difficult to recycle at end of life or have inadequate warranty periods. For example:

Alternatively a deposit such as is used on various containers in South Australia could be used instead of a tax. Ideally this would apply at the Federal level, or at least be standardised between participating States.

More New Car Stamp Duty on Inefficient Vehicles

The best time to encourage vehicle efficiency is at the point when the new car enters the vehicle fleet. To this end new vehicle stamp duty should be reformed to encourage vehicle efficiency. To keep it revenue neutral taxes on efficient vehicles should be reduced and tax on inefficient new vehicles increased. Electric cars might be tax-free.

Care needs to be taken to design a scheme that considers efficiency / capacity not just efficiency. Thus we encourage the most efficient passenger car, the most efficient people mover and the most efficient 2- tonne truck.

Note that increasing tax on existing inefficient vehicles is not recommended as it is unlikely to do any good. The vehicle already exists and a 'revenge' tax on it now is futile.

No Rates or Land Tax on 'Land For Wildlife'

All private land that is set aside for native vegetation and wildlife should be tax free. The land would need to be protected from stock and vehicles and kept reasonably free of introduced species. To be completely tax free the reserve would need to link up with neighbouring reserves and be a public foot way. (Land owners could capitalise on this by providing accommodation near such private trails. Legislation should strictly limit the land owners liability for injury in the reserve.)

The Carbon Tax Center

For more great information about the benefits of Carbon Taxes visit the  Carbon Tax Center.

Labor's Carbon Tax

13th Aug 2011: NewAustralia fully endorses Julia Gillard's carbon tax proposal. This is far better than the earlier ETS and far better than the Liberal's 'direct action' policy.

Taxing carbon better

13th August 2008: An ETS seems to have been accepted, but a carbon tax might be a better solution. more...

No to Carbon Trading

15th July 2008: ONE of the world's best-known economists, Jeffrey Sachs, has warned Australia against using an emissions trading scheme to tackle climate change, saying it would never win global support....Professor Sachs said the concept was "highly disliked" by China and other developing countries, and they would never agree to it. more...

G-8 Climate Failure

10th July 2008: India and China rejected the Group of Eight's declaration on climate change yesterday as leaders of the developing world demanded that rich countries should take a stronger lead on preventing global warming. more...

Petrol $8 Litre by 2018

11th July 2008: PETROL prices could reach $8 a litre within a decade if oil production peaks and Australia is not ready to shift to alternatives, according to a CSIRO analysis. more...

British Columbia's Carbon Tax

26th Feb 2008: British Columbia will implement a carbon tax of $10 per metric ton of carbon dioxide on July 1, rising in $5 / tonne annual increments to reach $30 in 2012. more...